|
The state
structure of the USSR was, on face value, a federation, and fifteen
nominally sovereign republics were considered to be the constituent
units of a federal union. The name of the nation – the Union of
Soviet Socialist Republics – also implied the existence of a federal
state. Most structures of power at the central level were replicated
in the union republics: they had their own constitutions, national
plan, and budget. |
 |
|
However, there
was one thing in the Soviet regime’s setup that turned all the
formal constitutional provisions of Soviet federalism into a moot
issue. In the Soviet system, the party was the real source of all
legislative policy and the controlling factor behind the formal
governmental organs. But the centralized party hierarchy rejected
the federal principle. The party organizations of the union
republics were not national parties, but branches of the single
unitary Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The party was the
ultimate deciding factor on all matters of policy, and the central
supreme party organs at the top in Moscow could always overrule or
ignore any formal constitutional provisions.
The union
authorities controlled major productive resources throughout the
country, including land, natural resources, industry, and human
capital, and made strategic decisions about economic development in
the republics. The control of the money supply was also an
exclusively central function. Apart from the party, other unionwide
control structures such as the KGB, army, and economic bureaucracy
penetrated into each republic and facilitated the center’s
supremacy.
All this meant
that, in reality, Soviet federalism was formal and ephemeral. The
USSR was in fact a unitary state with a measure of administrative
devolution. Genuine federalism was not viable in a state where the
ruling party wielded absolute power.
Copyrighted material