|
|
Local
governors’ autonomy was further significantly cut by the president’s
regional reform package passed by the Duma in June 2000. The laws
stripped the regional governors and the heads of the regional
parliaments of their ex officio mandate in the Federation Council
and replaced them with regional representatives elected or confirmed
by the regional legislatures. As a result, the regional bosses were
transformed from serious players on the national political stage to
purely local politicians. |

The loss of
direct control over Russia’s legislative agenda also meant the loss
of bargaining power in negotiations with the different centers of
power especially the federal agencies located in Moscow. What is
more, deprived of their seats in the upper house, the governors lost
their parliamentary immunity and could now be liable for criminal
prosecution. The new laws also gave the president the power to
recall regional governors or dissolve regional parliaments that do
not observe federal laws.
In the first
term of Putin’s presidency, his all-out campaign to rebuild the
central state has been largely successful and has produced a much
more centralized structure, in which once-independent regional
governors have been significantly undermined. The new system of
vertical power, more tightly controlled by Moscow, is now in force.
Legislative changes in the status of governors have led to a clearer
delineation of duties between authorities of different levels and
curbed the willful and arbitrary rule of certain of the regional
bosses.
However, given
the long and often unsuccessful history of attempts by Moscow to
centralize, it is too early to say whether the reform to control the
Russian leviathan will work in the long run and will be effective
against corrupt governors and in cutting through local vested
groups.
Copyrighted material