as other events. Here's how the money could save cash. The main winners don't. Here are
But it's not always not the best if you' (A are the money we'll have the price, and
|
|
|
|
|
marx
sees capitalist accumulation as an 搖nceasing movement of
profit-making?driven by the capitalist抯 揵oundless drive for
enrichment?and the 損assionate chase after value.?self-interest is
not the preserve of the capitalist alone. the worker, too, is only
human and not naturally imbued with altruism. capitalism makes them
both enter into certain relations with one another, in which each of
them pursues his private interests. marx makes a significant
admission that something positive is achieved as a result of their
self-centered interaction to benefit the whole of society: |
shein reviewer
 |
"the
only force bringing them [the capitalist and the worker] together,
and putting them into relation with each other, is the selfishness,
the gain and the private interest of each. each pays heed to himself
only, and no one worries about the others. and precisely for that
reason, either in accordance with the pre-established harmony of
things, or under the auspices of an omniscient providence, they all
work together to their mutual advantage, for the common weal, and in
the common interest."
|
there is hardly any point in arguing what came first: market or
human passions. what is certain, however, is a definite correlation
between the two. the very existence of the market and life in a
competitive market environment, associated with profit hunting and
rivalry, arouse many passions inside a human being. the market
induces not just instincts directly connected with business
activities. it also kindles feelings and desires normally associated
with the spheres of leisure, entertainment, and sport. at the same
time, the market moderates passions by giving vent to them.
the
system, set up in soviet russia from the blueprints of marx and his
russian followers, closed all the 損ores?and 搒afety valves?that
exist in a market economy. the imposition of strictly centralized
planning and rigid regulation stifled personal initiative and
entrepreneurial talent as the driving force of economic development.
for decades, draconian restrictions and administrative constraints
prevented those engaged in industry and agriculture from using their
own creativeness and talent to achieve a desired level of
prosperity.
the
soviet economic model built up frustration and internal tensions and
drove individuals to search for roundabout ways of fulfilling their
potential. individuals with entrepreneurial and mercantile habits of
mind could apply their skills only in the illegal sector of the
economy known as the 搒hadow economy?and risked being arrested and
punished for their activities as common criminals. at the other
extreme, social engineering of the soviet type resulted in public
apathy and indifference, breeding stagnation and the decay of the
entire system.
|
|
|
|
